01-17-2012, 09:18 PM
Quote:Hmmm. The more of the stuff I see coming out of this site, the more I doubt the battlefield (or Field of Conflict, as The Good Dr Coulston would insist I say ) explanation.Could you explain, perhaps?
As such I would´t be amazed if you were correct. Would certainly not be the first case, where Hypotheses became facts (or "factoids" as you would say, I presume) without being subject to any method. Or hermeneutic logic, at least.
See => Kalkriese / "Varus disaster"
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.