10-08-2006, 06:57 PM
1. Remains of bone scabbard do not necessarily mean that sword was property of the deceased.
2. Weapons in ones grave do not necessarily mean that he or she is a member of roman army in any way.
3. possibility that a woman was accompanied with some unit in some specific moment does not mean that women served in roman army.
Don't use thesis that scholars stick to their theories, there is simple explanation for this, archeology is a science, needs a lot of proofs for modifiyng them.
haire
2. Weapons in ones grave do not necessarily mean that he or she is a member of roman army in any way.
3. possibility that a woman was accompanied with some unit in some specific moment does not mean that women served in roman army.
Don't use thesis that scholars stick to their theories, there is simple explanation for this, archeology is a science, needs a lot of proofs for modifiyng them.
haire
Stefan Pop-Lazic
by a stuff demand, and personal hesitation
by a stuff demand, and personal hesitation