06-08-2007, 05:43 PM
Quote:but surely the only way to depict scuta emblems on carvings is by raising them or recessing them (assuming that the sculpture was not painted of course).I agree completely
Quote:This is why I would not be quick to claim that raised relief on parts of sculpture or carved bas relief is evidence of the same on the actual item represented.I agree here also however; having raised relief in sculpture, seemingly at least, leans more toward raised and embossed on the actual items. Obviously it doesn't mean the originals weren't raised and embossed.
This brings me to my other point … or moreover my other question… should Roman Republican shields be plain and painted with only one sold color?
I am most defiantly of the opinion that it would be beyond un-Roman like to carry a plain mono-colored shield. At the very least I believe the Republican Roman shields should have painted lightening bolts, wings, and/or other adornments such as wreaths or crescents. Everything I’ve read concerning Roman armor is peppered with the words “shinny, polished, decorated, color, color, and color.â€
Vale!
Antonivs Marivs Congianocvs
aka_ANTH0NY_C0NGIAN0
My ancient coin collection:
[url:3lgwsbe7]http://www.congiano.com/MyCoins/index.htm[/url]
Antonivs Marivs Congianocvs
aka_ANTH0NY_C0NGIAN0
My ancient coin collection:
[url:3lgwsbe7]http://www.congiano.com/MyCoins/index.htm[/url]