What do you mean, The Celtic cross?

[Treveri Gaul]

" Its story begins with heavy Roman attacks after the Mediterranean World become part of Empire . As a consequense vast sourcesof human economical and military power ready for new offensive wars. At the same three large fronts were opened towards Gallia and Britannia againts the Carpathian Basin /the Ancient Hungary /and Pontus and in the Ancient East against the Partian Empire, on altogether many tousand s kilometers long military front zone. Also capable commanders were at hand. The intrigues the mad power fights of members of the first triumvirate characterise the epoch. In the first act of this war betweeen inflecting and non inflecting (agglutinative) peoples the exponential growth of the Empire couls be stopped. It could not conquer the territories behind the Rhine and Danube and the Parthian Empirecould resist over centuries. This stabilization, however made impossible to strengthen the Empire with novel external sources. The corruption and the growing inefficiency of the slave-keeper society deteriorated slowly the functioning of the state. When the military emperors came to power even Rome ceased to be centre of the empire. Attila supported by the emerging German allies failed the rests of the overaged agonising empire. He could suspend the Slave Empire but he could not restore the ancient Celtic Europe. He even did not conquer Rome however returned to the Carpathian Basin. The allied Germans had another opinion they wanted Rome and let murder him. Somewhat later they got what tehy wanted. However the Hunnian king of Rome Odoaker should have been killed before. The Germans settled the ruins of Rome and inherided the idea of the Empire. The numerous proofs presented led the author to deny the theories founding the Indo-European history and linguistic and does not aggre with the idea to consider the inflecting people as homogeneus family. He denies the Indo-European nature of the Etruscans, Hettitas, Scythians and Celtic peoples. By this for large supporting columns are fallen from the artefact building of Indo-European hisrory. He says, now we cab understand why the linguistic is so important for the Indo-Europeans and funs of Finno-Ugrians. The ingogermanization of the Scythians made possible the building of the genealogy up to India and from India to Europe again. The reclassification of the Celtic culture served the foundation of the idea of superb Europe in the opposite case it should have been accepted that the Western civilisation is not of Indo-European origin. The transformation of the Hettites meant the artifical disruption of the linguistic unity of the ancient Eastern agglutinative cultures. However this made impossible to accept the idea of the movement of these people towards Europe.

to be Continued