Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Short men had what it takes for 2m years
#8
Quote:Sure, shorter soldiers have a lower center of balance, but taller soldiers have more reach. Taller people are also better at mountain climbing for the same reason.

Since shorter men are more stable I think they make better cavalrymen - less prone to fall off.

Quote:Sure, there is a trade-off and this is not ideal in every situation...

Right, taller types have more range but I figure maybe shorter guys are more nimble ?

Quote:And let's not forget the Roman Army did have some parameters defining a minimum height for recruits.

Oh, I know it. I just posted this research so we can all make light of its flawed conclusions (and the researchers). There are other factors, like - what if the shorter race (e.g. Romans, Greeks) had SUPERIOR tools (e.g. the gladius) than the taller race and MORE of them to go around for their side ? Not every Celt or German could have a sword. So, there's the economic angle missing from this research as well.

~Theo
Jaime
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Short men had what it takes for 2m years - by Theodosius the Great - 03-20-2007, 04:39 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  This takes dumb to a new level... ParthianBow 4 1,394 09-14-2010, 11:01 PM
Last Post: Gaius Decius Aquilius

Forum Jump: