Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
body armour and arrows
#70
It is not a hot debating issue. Nobody has seriously considered it a valid type of armour for decades. The term "besongne quasiguesnée" doesn't exist in any text before the 19th century. It was a term invented by Victorian scholars in an attempt to define the armour represented in some contemporary illustrations. It is the overwhelming consensus of the armour community today that it never existed and that those sculptures and illustrations represent nothing more elaborate than standard 4-in-1 mail made of alternating rows of solid and riveted links. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://pub45.ezboard.com/bromanarmytalk.showUserPublicProfile?gid=danielraymondhoward>Daniel Raymond Howard</A> at: 3/25/04 6:52 am<br></i>
Reply


Messages In This Thread
body armour and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-16-2004, 02:35 PM
Re: body armour and arrows - by richard - 03-16-2004, 06:21 PM
Not likely - by Matthew Amt - 03-16-2004, 08:28 PM
thoughts? - by Anonymous - 03-16-2004, 08:55 PM
armours - by Anonymous - 03-16-2004, 09:12 PM
Re: armours - by Nathan Ross - 03-16-2004, 09:23 PM
armours - by Anonymous - 03-16-2004, 09:33 PM
Re: armours - by Anonymous - 03-16-2004, 09:45 PM
Re: body armour and arrows - by FlaviusCrispus - 03-16-2004, 09:54 PM
Re: body armour and arrows - by Nathan Ross - 03-16-2004, 10:13 PM
Re: body armour and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-17-2004, 12:11 AM
arrows - by Anonymous - 03-17-2004, 12:47 AM
Re: arrows - by Anonymous - 03-17-2004, 03:41 AM
Re: arrows - by Anonymous - 03-17-2004, 03:54 AM
armour - by Anonymous - 03-17-2004, 08:08 AM
Re: armours - by Nathan Ross - 03-17-2004, 11:06 AM
lorichae - by Anonymous - 03-17-2004, 11:42 AM
Re: lorichae - by Anonymous - 03-17-2004, 03:43 PM
carrhae - by Goffredo - 03-17-2004, 03:49 PM
Re: carrhae - by Nathan Ross - 03-17-2004, 09:47 PM
Re: carrhae - by Crispvs - 03-17-2004, 10:16 PM
seggie cont. - by Anonymous - 03-17-2004, 10:50 PM
Re: body armour and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-18-2004, 01:46 AM
Re: carrhae - by Anonymous - 03-18-2004, 02:38 AM
arrows - by Anonymous - 03-18-2004, 08:32 AM
Re: arrows - by scythius - 03-18-2004, 08:45 AM
Re: carrhae - by aitor iriarte - 03-18-2004, 12:24 PM
Re: carrhae - by Anonymous - 03-18-2004, 02:23 PM
...we should do the same... - by Anonymous - 03-18-2004, 02:46 PM
Re: ...we should do the same... - by John Maddox Roberts - 03-18-2004, 03:44 PM
Tests, etc. - by Matthew Amt - 03-18-2004, 03:57 PM
Re: Tests, etc. - by Anonymous - 03-18-2004, 04:31 PM
Bodkins, etc. - by Matthew Amt - 03-18-2004, 05:13 PM
Comment on missile fire at Agincourt - by Anonymous - 03-18-2004, 10:48 PM
Bows, arrows and archers - by Anonymous - 03-18-2004, 10:49 PM
Re: Bows, arrows and archers - by Anonymous - 03-18-2004, 11:21 PM
the question become bigger - by Anonymous - 03-19-2004, 08:21 AM
Re: the question become bigger - by Anonymous - 03-19-2004, 02:30 PM
body injuries - by Anonymous - 03-19-2004, 03:14 PM
Battle of Carrhae - by Anonymous - 03-19-2004, 03:43 PM
right! - by Anonymous - 03-19-2004, 04:13 PM
Re: right! - by Anonymous - 03-19-2004, 05:04 PM
this is interesting! - by Anonymous - 03-19-2004, 05:15 PM
Re: limb strikes - by Anonymous - 03-19-2004, 05:45 PM
Death (and stuff) - by Anonymous - 03-19-2004, 06:07 PM
Re: limb strikes - by Alexandr K - 03-19-2004, 06:28 PM
Re: limb strikes - by Anonymous - 03-19-2004, 06:52 PM
Re: limb strikes - by aitor iriarte - 03-19-2004, 07:21 PM
Armor coverage, etc. - by Matthew Amt - 03-19-2004, 08:27 PM
conclusion - by Anonymous - 03-20-2004, 08:15 AM
Re: conclusion - by Anonymous - 03-20-2004, 02:54 PM
Germanic bows - by Wagnijo - 03-20-2004, 04:22 PM
Medieval Mail - by Anonymous - 03-22-2004, 12:08 AM
Re: Medieval Mail - by Anonymous - 03-22-2004, 04:21 AM
Re: Medieval Mail - by Anonymous - 03-22-2004, 06:02 AM
Re: Medieval Mail - by aitor iriarte - 03-22-2004, 06:57 AM
Hollywood movies - by Anonymous - 03-22-2004, 10:36 AM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-22-2004, 11:17 AM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-22-2004, 12:18 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-22-2004, 02:02 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-22-2004, 02:27 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Nathan Ross - 03-22-2004, 05:22 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-22-2004, 09:11 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-22-2004, 09:42 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-23-2004, 11:09 AM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-24-2004, 10:22 AM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-24-2004, 12:19 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-24-2004, 12:46 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-24-2004, 10:45 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-25-2004, 05:37 AM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-25-2004, 12:09 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-27-2004, 12:25 PM
Re: On mail and arrows - by Anonymous - 03-27-2004, 01:07 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Technological studies on Bronze Age metal body armour Steven James 0 913 12-28-2016, 12:21 PM
Last Post: Steven James
  Men of Bronze: Experimental approaches to the first body armour in the Aegean and Eur Steven James 0 1,068 09-25-2016, 05:59 AM
Last Post: Steven James
  Arrows Against Linen and Leather Armour Steven James 1 1,863 09-21-2016, 07:41 AM
Last Post: MonsGraupius

Forum Jump: