10-19-2007, 09:39 PM
Quote:Vortigern Studies:321ojr93 Wrote:And OF COURSE it's unpublished!Of course you are right: reports of unpublished finds ought to be ignored. On the other hand, bona fide finds like the Roman watchtowers west of Utrecht are also unpublished (mens sana qui mal y pense). But generally, I agree that we should not impressed by an unpublished Caucasian Skeleton.
Vortigern/ Jona,
:wink: I am not trying to impress you, or trying to get you to bite here, and I am not trying to sell anything, only participating in the conversation.
This is the information I was told by the anthropologist who was on the dig when the skeleton was found. He was very confident that it was pre-Columbian, and not Native American.....ie Caucasian. I will leave it at that. Believe what you want. :wink:
We all know that discoveries are not immediately published. It takes decades sometimes before the information is released.
"...quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est."
a.k.a. Paul M.
a.k.a. Paul M.