Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Use of Sources
#4
Quote:</em></strong><hr>Sometimes the issue is clouded by the differences in opinion expressed by historians, who are supposedly experts.<hr><br>
So what do you think makes an "expert" ?<br>
Why is Luttwak less of an expert than Potter? Why do you assume Elton is bad-mouthing Southern & Dixon? Where does a historical novelist like Colleen McCullough figure in this?!<br>
Have you considered that there might be good books and not-so-good books written by knowledgeable and not-so-knowledgeable authors? And it might be the job of the reviewer to point these out (if she can)? <p></p><i></i>
** Vincula/Lucy **
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Use of Sources - by Anonymous - 08-06-2004, 08:17 PM
Re: Use of Sources - by Jasper Oorthuys - 08-07-2004, 06:20 AM
Re: Use of Sources - by Anonymous - 08-07-2004, 06:43 PM
Re: Use of Sources - by Vincula - 08-08-2004, 02:22 PM
scholarship - by Anonymous - 08-08-2004, 06:08 PM
Re: scholarship - by Jasper Oorthuys - 08-08-2004, 07:23 PM
Re: scholarship - by hansvl - 08-09-2004, 07:08 PM
Re: sweeping statements, versus specialization - by Anonymous - 08-11-2004, 06:26 PM

Forum Jump: