Is this the most outrageous statement in a book?

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Linear Mode

Is this the most outrageous statement in a book?

markhebb Offline

Offline

Signifer

Posts: 78
Threads: 8
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation: 4

#4

02-17-2012, 05:08 AM

I would assume ValVict. is talking of the assumption that the De Rebus was 1. actually read by valens; 2. dated so securely.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by ValentinianVictrix - 02-17-2012, 02:08 AM

Re: Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by MARCvSVIBIvSMAvRINvS - 02-17-2012, 03:01 AM

Re: Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by D B Campbell - 02-17-2012, 04:35 AM

Re: Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by markhebb - 02-17-2012, 05:08 AM

Re: Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by Robert Vermaat - 02-17-2012, 06:31 AM

Re: Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by Nik Gaukroger - 02-17-2012, 02:17 PM

Re: Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by sonic - 02-17-2012, 03:22 PM

Re: Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by D B Campbell - 02-17-2012, 04:56 PM

Re: Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by ValentinianVictrix - 02-18-2012, 01:46 AM

Re: Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by Magnus - 02-18-2012, 04:03 AM

Re: Is this the most outrageous statement in a book? - by D B Campbell - 02-18-2012, 08:34 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	An odd statement from Goldsworthy	Gladius Hispaniensis	16	3,693	11-06-2007, 12:57 AM Last Post: Tarbicus

View a Printable Version

Forum Jump: