Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Women roles
#12
I must admit I agree with all of you. Women warriors in our history make little sense. And sadly this makes reinacting for the "tom boys" of the Legions difficult. I think I shall look into portraying a young man, and if any one argues, thats their problem.<br>
<br>
Wioth so much armour on, it should mask me enough that only close up My gender will be revealed. I'll speak to my officers about this. We are concerned that the out door play we are involved in does not like to use men in women roles, or Women in men roles, but I have earned my position by assisting the legion for several years now. <p></p><i></i>
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 02:52 AM
Re: Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 10:59 AM
Re: Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 03:22 PM
Re: Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 04:44 PM
Re: Women roles - by John Maddox Roberts - 08-21-2004, 01:47 PM
Women in the military - by Matthew Amt - 08-21-2004, 03:58 PM
Re: Women in the military - by Anonymous - 08-21-2004, 05:49 PM
Re: Women in the military - by Anonymous - 08-21-2004, 10:50 PM
Re: Women in the military - by Anonymous - 08-22-2004, 09:01 AM
Women in the auxiliaries - by Matthew Amt - 08-22-2004, 05:32 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by richard - 08-22-2004, 11:57 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by Anonymous - 08-23-2004, 03:03 AM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by aitor iriarte - 08-23-2004, 05:53 AM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by Anonymous - 08-23-2004, 08:37 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by Anonymous - 08-23-2004, 09:05 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by richard - 08-24-2004, 01:47 AM
You make maille? - by Anonymous - 08-24-2004, 02:14 AM
Hmmm, Xeno.. No - by Anonymous - 08-24-2004, 03:19 AM
Re: Hmmm, Xeno.. No - by JRSCline - 08-24-2004, 10:00 AM
Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-24-2004, 10:05 PM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-24-2004, 11:00 PM
Re: Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-25-2004, 02:31 AM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 02:55 AM
Re: Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-25-2004, 04:05 PM
Re: Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-25-2004, 04:12 PM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 04:42 PM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 06:48 PM
Female miles - by scythius - 08-25-2004, 07:04 PM
chicks in armor...yeah! - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 09:07 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 07:32 AM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 11:14 AM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 03:31 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 10:33 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 03:18 AM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 01:07 PM
Children - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 02:53 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 09:38 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Crispvs - 09-02-2004, 07:58 PM
Re: Women reenacting soldiers, my $.02 - by Anonymous - 09-07-2004, 07:14 PM
Re: Women reenacting soldiers, my $.02 - by Anonymous - 09-09-2004, 09:57 AM
Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-23-2004, 11:24 AM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-24-2004, 01:07 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-29-2004, 09:33 AM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Anonymous - 09-29-2004, 02:03 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-30-2004, 10:35 AM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-30-2004, 02:47 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Anonymous - 09-30-2004, 07:00 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 10-01-2004, 12:47 AM

Forum Jump: