Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Women roles
#47
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. If a woman walked up to me and wanted to join my group with a military impression, I'm not going to say no. She may have no interest in what women did. That doesn't demean women, it's her personal interests. So long as other women do that, so be it. I also will not encourage women to portray a male unless they choose to do so.<br>
<br>
Encouragement is the way many groups get what they need without mandating something. We can encourage women to portray female roles during the 5th Century (as in our group) but we don't keep them doing just that. After all, if we do that then we should require some men to portray slaves, servants, craftsmen, etc. After all, <em>all</em> men weren't soldiers<br>
<br>
Tom <p></p><i></i>
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 02:52 AM
Re: Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 10:59 AM
Re: Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 03:22 PM
Re: Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 04:44 PM
Re: Women roles - by John Maddox Roberts - 08-21-2004, 01:47 PM
Women in the military - by Matthew Amt - 08-21-2004, 03:58 PM
Re: Women in the military - by Anonymous - 08-21-2004, 05:49 PM
Re: Women in the military - by Anonymous - 08-21-2004, 10:50 PM
Re: Women in the military - by Anonymous - 08-22-2004, 09:01 AM
Women in the auxiliaries - by Matthew Amt - 08-22-2004, 05:32 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by richard - 08-22-2004, 11:57 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by Anonymous - 08-23-2004, 03:03 AM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by aitor iriarte - 08-23-2004, 05:53 AM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by Anonymous - 08-23-2004, 08:37 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by Anonymous - 08-23-2004, 09:05 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by richard - 08-24-2004, 01:47 AM
You make maille? - by Anonymous - 08-24-2004, 02:14 AM
Hmmm, Xeno.. No - by Anonymous - 08-24-2004, 03:19 AM
Re: Hmmm, Xeno.. No - by JRSCline - 08-24-2004, 10:00 AM
Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-24-2004, 10:05 PM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-24-2004, 11:00 PM
Re: Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-25-2004, 02:31 AM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 02:55 AM
Re: Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-25-2004, 04:05 PM
Re: Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-25-2004, 04:12 PM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 04:42 PM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 06:48 PM
Female miles - by scythius - 08-25-2004, 07:04 PM
chicks in armor...yeah! - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 09:07 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 07:32 AM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 11:14 AM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 03:31 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 10:33 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 03:18 AM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 01:07 PM
Children - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 02:53 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 09:38 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Crispvs - 09-02-2004, 07:58 PM
Re: Women reenacting soldiers, my $.02 - by Anonymous - 09-07-2004, 07:14 PM
Re: Women reenacting soldiers, my $.02 - by Anonymous - 09-09-2004, 09:57 AM
Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-23-2004, 11:24 AM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-24-2004, 01:07 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-29-2004, 09:33 AM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Anonymous - 09-29-2004, 02:03 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-30-2004, 10:35 AM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-30-2004, 02:47 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Anonymous - 09-30-2004, 07:00 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 10-01-2004, 12:47 AM

Forum Jump: