Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
When Did The Roman Army Standardize Using Plate Armor?
#19
(08-25-2021, 01:06 AM)Dan Howard Wrote:
Quote:But, I think you have forgotten by purpose the real advantage of the Segmentata: the greater protection level on covered parts.
This is a myth that needs to be squashed. All types of metal armour - mail, scale, lamellar, segmetata, etc. provided similar levels of protection.
Do you want to squash material science books? They will explain you in detail why you are wrong on the full topic. Different materials offer different levels of protection. And different shapes and assemblies offer different levels of protection. Each discontinuity reduces the ability to distribute the impact, that is, it concentrates its force. The mail is the one that has the greatest discontinuities, that is, it is the worst in dissipating the impact.
- CaesarAugustus
www.romanempire.cloud
(Marco Parente)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: When Did The Roman Army Standardize Using Plate Armor? - by CaesarAugustus - 08-25-2021, 05:24 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Roman Full Plate Armor? SigniferOne 75 23,899 01-16-2013, 02:39 AM
Last Post: Burzum
  Plate Armor Endurance study rrgg 14 3,511 07-22-2011, 10:12 PM
Last Post: Crispvs
  Plate-mail hybrid armor FlaviusCrispus 31 6,982 06-28-2006, 04:21 PM
Last Post: MARCvSVIBIvSMAvRINvS

Forum Jump: