|
add Archaeology to the \'Reenactment Reconstruction.." t
|
12-29-2001, 06:53 PM
Just to be awkward, I would have thought it belonged better with Military History (since history and archaeology are disciplines which enable re-enactment and reconstruction). Although they are often uncomfortable bedfellows, you can't really study the Roman army without both history and archaeology and retain any plausibility... (not that that has stood in the way of some classicists... ;-).<br>
<br> Mike Bishop <p></p><i></i> |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
add Archaeology to the \'Reenactment Reconstruction.." t - by richard - 12-29-2001, 03:02 AM
Re: add Archaeology to the \'Reenactment Reconstruction..&quo - by Anonymous - 12-29-2001, 06:09 AM
Re: add Archaeology to the \'Reenactment Reconstruction..& - by richard - 12-29-2001, 12:11 PM
yep, include explicitely archeology - by Goffredo - 12-29-2001, 01:13 PM
Re: add Archaeology to the \'Reenactment Reconstruction..& - by Anonymous - 12-29-2001, 06:14 PM
Re: add Archaeology to the \'Reenactment Reconstruction..& - by mcbishop - 12-29-2001, 06:53 PM
Re: add Archaeology to the \'Reenactment Reconstruction..& - by richard - 12-29-2001, 07:45 PM
|
