04-15-2001, 07:43 PM
Salvete,<br>
<br>
The ISBN number of <i> Diocletian and the Roman recovery</i> is 0-415-91827-8.<br>
<br>
<br>
Here are some references to other publications dealing with the army of the tetrarchy:<br>
<br>
Berchem, D. van, <i> L'armée de Dioclétien et la réforme constantienne</i> (Paris 1952).<br>
<br>
Bowman, A.K., 'The military occupation of Upper Egypt in the reign of Diocletian' in: <i> Bulletin of the American society of papyrologists</i> 15 (1978), 25-38.<br>
<br>
Duncan-Jones, R.P., 'Pay and numbers in Diocletian's army' in: <i> Chiron</i> 8 (1978), 541-560.<br>
<br>
Nischer, N.C., 'The army reforms of Diocletian and Constantine and their modifications up to the times of the Notitia Dignitatum' in: <i> JRS</i> 13 (1923), 1-55.<br>
<br>
Parker, H.M.D., 'The legions of Diocletian and Constantine' in: <i> JRS</i> 23 (1933), 175-189.<br>
<br>
Seston, W., 'Du comitatus de Dioclétien aux comitatenses de Constantin' in: <i> Historia</i> 4 (1955), 284-296.<br>
<br>
Speidel, M.P., 'The road to Dumata (Jawf in Saudi Arabia) and the frontier policy of praetensione colligare' in: <i> Historia</i> 36 (1987), 213-221.<br>
<br>
Speidel, M.P., 'The Later Roman field army and the Guard of the High Empire' in: <i> Latomus</i> 46 (1987), 375-379.<br>
<br>
Speidel, M.P., 'Maxentius' praetorians' in: <i> Roman army studies II</i> (Stuttgart 1992), 385-389.<br>
<br>
Apart from these specialised articles concentrating on various aspects the army of the tetrarchy is usually also included in studies of the late Roman army, though these tend to concentrate on the later fourth century CE. An in-depth study that would focus primarily on the tetrarchic army is unfortunately not (yet?) available.<br>
<br>
Valete,<br>
<br>
Sander van Dorst<br>
<br>
<p></p><i></i>
<br>
The ISBN number of <i> Diocletian and the Roman recovery</i> is 0-415-91827-8.<br>
<br>
<br>
Here are some references to other publications dealing with the army of the tetrarchy:<br>
<br>
Berchem, D. van, <i> L'armée de Dioclétien et la réforme constantienne</i> (Paris 1952).<br>
<br>
Bowman, A.K., 'The military occupation of Upper Egypt in the reign of Diocletian' in: <i> Bulletin of the American society of papyrologists</i> 15 (1978), 25-38.<br>
<br>
Duncan-Jones, R.P., 'Pay and numbers in Diocletian's army' in: <i> Chiron</i> 8 (1978), 541-560.<br>
<br>
Nischer, N.C., 'The army reforms of Diocletian and Constantine and their modifications up to the times of the Notitia Dignitatum' in: <i> JRS</i> 13 (1923), 1-55.<br>
<br>
Parker, H.M.D., 'The legions of Diocletian and Constantine' in: <i> JRS</i> 23 (1933), 175-189.<br>
<br>
Seston, W., 'Du comitatus de Dioclétien aux comitatenses de Constantin' in: <i> Historia</i> 4 (1955), 284-296.<br>
<br>
Speidel, M.P., 'The road to Dumata (Jawf in Saudi Arabia) and the frontier policy of praetensione colligare' in: <i> Historia</i> 36 (1987), 213-221.<br>
<br>
Speidel, M.P., 'The Later Roman field army and the Guard of the High Empire' in: <i> Latomus</i> 46 (1987), 375-379.<br>
<br>
Speidel, M.P., 'Maxentius' praetorians' in: <i> Roman army studies II</i> (Stuttgart 1992), 385-389.<br>
<br>
Apart from these specialised articles concentrating on various aspects the army of the tetrarchy is usually also included in studies of the late Roman army, though these tend to concentrate on the later fourth century CE. An in-depth study that would focus primarily on the tetrarchic army is unfortunately not (yet?) available.<br>
<br>
Valete,<br>
<br>
Sander van Dorst<br>
<br>
<p></p><i></i>