01-13-2017, 04:49 PM
"I agree with Nathan" well if we all did that it wouldn't be much of a thread, so I guess I'll have to hold out just for the sake of debate......
"it's not a size nor location that is typical" great! wouldn't want ordinary....
"a site visit can't confirm it as only aerial photography with crop marks or extensive digging could validate it." done the site visit, it's a little less than anonymous, I would vote for a bit of a dig, it doesn't need to be extensive though, a couple of sections might crack it. But it won't be me and it won't be any time soon.
"it's not a size nor location that is typical" great! wouldn't want ordinary....
"a site visit can't confirm it as only aerial photography with crop marks or extensive digging could validate it." done the site visit, it's a little less than anonymous, I would vote for a bit of a dig, it doesn't need to be extensive though, a couple of sections might crack it. But it won't be me and it won't be any time soon.