01-16-2012, 09:36 PM
Well they did bother to cover their linothorax and IT IS completely unneccesary.
So why not the spollas?
But in absense of solid evidence I agree that that your opinion on spollas if does not contain the whole truth it contains a serious part of it.
The only certain thing is that spollas had something to do with armor.
The question is: was it "the armor" or an "accesory of armor"?
You favor the first option and I favor the second and weboth hope fro motre archaelogical evidence seding light on the matter.
Kind regards
So why not the spollas?
But in absense of solid evidence I agree that that your opinion on spollas if does not contain the whole truth it contains a serious part of it.
The only certain thing is that spollas had something to do with armor.
The question is: was it "the armor" or an "accesory of armor"?
You favor the first option and I favor the second and weboth hope fro motre archaelogical evidence seding light on the matter.
Kind regards
HOPLITE14GR (aka Stefanos)
Phokean Ekdromos
http://hetairoi.de/
http://hoplomachia.gr
http://stefanosskarmintzos.wordpress.com
Phokean Ekdromos
http://hetairoi.de/
http://hoplomachia.gr
http://stefanosskarmintzos.wordpress.com