11-22-2003, 07:34 PM
We have here something to consider, as I recall that in Napoleonic times most of the recorded wounds are by fire weapons, but most commanders of the time considered the bayonet far more efective than the bullet, so we have either<br>
They were plainly wrong<br>
or<br>
Bayonet (and close weapons in general) inflicted so severe wounds that they were almost always mortal<br>
<br>
I don´t have an opinion on this, anyone can help me? <p></p><i></i>
They were plainly wrong<br>
or<br>
Bayonet (and close weapons in general) inflicted so severe wounds that they were almost always mortal<br>
<br>
I don´t have an opinion on this, anyone can help me? <p></p><i></i>
