Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Women roles
#31
Viventia,<br>
As a matter of fact, I think that soldiers who were wearing a helmet would wear body armour too (Yes, I know that the soldier painted at the Siracuse catacomb is wearing helmet with no armour, but that is rather an exception than the rule )<br>
In the period we re-enact, a long-sleeved mail shirt would be the most usual armour for common soldiers. Well, a mail shirt needs a padded undergarment to be effective and you could distribute the padding at your will to increase your 'manly' appearance (i.e. broad shoulders or the like...)<br>
Just my two cents, from a late Roman to another one!<br>
<br>
Aitor <p></p><i></i>
It\'s all an accident, an accident of hands. Mine, others, all without mind, from one extreme to another, but neither works nor will ever.

Rolf Steiner
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 02:52 AM
Re: Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 10:59 AM
Re: Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 03:22 PM
Re: Women roles - by Anonymous - 08-20-2004, 04:44 PM
Re: Women roles - by John Maddox Roberts - 08-21-2004, 01:47 PM
Women in the military - by Matthew Amt - 08-21-2004, 03:58 PM
Re: Women in the military - by Anonymous - 08-21-2004, 05:49 PM
Re: Women in the military - by Anonymous - 08-21-2004, 10:50 PM
Re: Women in the military - by Anonymous - 08-22-2004, 09:01 AM
Women in the auxiliaries - by Matthew Amt - 08-22-2004, 05:32 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by richard - 08-22-2004, 11:57 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by Anonymous - 08-23-2004, 03:03 AM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by aitor iriarte - 08-23-2004, 05:53 AM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by Anonymous - 08-23-2004, 08:37 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by Anonymous - 08-23-2004, 09:05 PM
Re: Women in the auxiliaries - by richard - 08-24-2004, 01:47 AM
You make maille? - by Anonymous - 08-24-2004, 02:14 AM
Hmmm, Xeno.. No - by Anonymous - 08-24-2004, 03:19 AM
Re: Hmmm, Xeno.. No - by JRSCline - 08-24-2004, 10:00 AM
Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-24-2004, 10:05 PM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-24-2004, 11:00 PM
Re: Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-25-2004, 02:31 AM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 02:55 AM
Re: Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-25-2004, 04:05 PM
Re: Mail - by Lucius Aurelius Metellus - 08-25-2004, 04:12 PM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 04:42 PM
Re: Mail - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 06:48 PM
Female miles - by scythius - 08-25-2004, 07:04 PM
chicks in armor...yeah! - by Anonymous - 08-25-2004, 09:07 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 07:32 AM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by aitor iriarte - 08-31-2004, 07:47 AM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 11:14 AM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 03:31 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 08-31-2004, 10:33 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 03:18 AM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 01:07 PM
Children - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 02:53 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Anonymous - 09-01-2004, 09:38 PM
Re: Women re-enacting Roman soldiers - by Crispvs - 09-02-2004, 07:58 PM
Re: Women reenacting soldiers, my $.02 - by Anonymous - 09-07-2004, 07:14 PM
Re: Women reenacting soldiers, my $.02 - by Anonymous - 09-09-2004, 09:57 AM
Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-23-2004, 11:24 AM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-24-2004, 01:07 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-29-2004, 09:33 AM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Anonymous - 09-29-2004, 02:03 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-30-2004, 10:35 AM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 09-30-2004, 02:47 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Anonymous - 09-30-2004, 07:00 PM
Re: Women roles:Pottery - by Iulia Cassia Vegetia - 10-01-2004, 12:47 AM

Forum Jump: