Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Women, and Roman Military Re-enactment
#27
I renact as an Auxilliary archer, and find that the chainmaille itself does a decent job disguising the chest area, and if you have further problems, just use some padding above and below.<br>
<br>
I can take the guys behavior, and even join them on occasion. reenactment is not for evry girl,but I for one enjoy it <p></p><i></i>
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Women, and Roman Military Re-enactment - by Anonymous - 01-07-2005, 11:58 PM
Re: Women, and Roman Military Re-enactment - by Anonymous - 01-08-2005, 12:13 AM
Re: Women, and Roman Military Re-enactment - by Anonymous - 01-08-2005, 03:27 AM
Re: Women, and Roman Military Re-enactment - by Anonymous - 01-08-2005, 06:35 AM
Re: Women, and Roman Military Re-enactment - by Anonymous - 01-08-2005, 01:06 PM
Re: Re: Women, and Roman Military Re-enactment - by Anonymous - 01-08-2005, 04:49 PM
Re: Women, and Roman Military Re-enactment - by Anonymous - 01-08-2005, 05:37 PM
women miles - by TFLAVIUSAMBIORIX - 01-09-2005, 02:29 AM
miles aren\'t everything - by richard - 01-09-2005, 04:04 AM
Turning women away? - by Anonymous - 01-09-2005, 11:53 AM
continued - by Anonymous - 01-10-2005, 12:39 AM
Hair and make up? - by Anonymous - 01-10-2005, 10:03 AM
This is an option - by Anonymous - 01-10-2005, 12:38 PM
Women re-enactors - by Anonymous - 01-10-2005, 04:25 PM
Re: Women re-enactors - by Anonymous - 01-10-2005, 11:54 PM
Re: Women re-enactors - by Anonymous - 01-11-2005, 03:10 AM
Re: Women re-enactors - by Jeroen Pelgrom - 01-11-2005, 08:54 AM
Gladiatrix - by Anonymous - 01-11-2005, 10:54 AM
Re: Gladiatrix - by Anonymous - 01-11-2005, 08:55 PM
Wrong! - by Anonymous - 01-11-2005, 09:29 PM
Re: you mean like this..... - by Anonymous - 01-12-2005, 12:39 AM
Re: reenacting - by Anonymous - 01-13-2005, 11:16 PM
Re: Men as women - by Anonymous - 01-14-2005, 08:54 PM
Re: Men as women - by ambrosius - 01-15-2005, 08:53 AM
Re: Men as women - by Anonymous - 01-15-2005, 02:39 PM
Re: Wrong! - by Anonymous - 01-18-2005, 10:36 PM

Forum Jump: