Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should RomanArmy.com have an Equipment Section?
#8
Speaking as a completely interested party, I think it would be an excellent idea to include equipment. Armamentarium is designed to be a detailed work of reference on military equipment (*every* piece, eventually) but there are many areas on which it will inevitably always fall short - most notably the basic run-down on equipment. The present Beginner's Guide section is inadequate, but the best I could do in the time faced with umpteen requests for assistance with homework etc. Given the encyclopaedic intentions of RomanArmy.com, I see no conflict. You wouldn't expect the Oxford Classical Dictionary to exclude a subject just because it is covered in more depth elsewhere - not everybody wants or needs the detail. Each gains from the existence of the other.<br>
<br>
It makes much more sense to make sure there is no overlap and that the two sites mesh together to provide the sort of coverage people want - both general and detailed. For starters, I could offer you the military equipment FAQ (it has already been ripped-off by at least one over-eager student's web site!), as I'm sure there are, for example, questions many reeanctors can think of that they get asked.<br>
<br>
Incidentally, copyright is the bane of my life: I have all of Robinson's photos which *could* be put on the web now, but raising the money to pay the reproduction fees is a nightmare; nevertheless, I am persisting. However, there are some bodies that outright refuse to allow reproduction on the web (even though they will let you put the piccies in a book - go figure).<br>
<br>
Armamentarium will be undergoing a thorough revamp in the near future, as soon as I have finished Vegetius.<br>
<br>
Mike Bishop <p></p><i></i>
You know my method. It is founded upon the observance of trifles

Blogging, tweeting, and mapping Hadrian\'s Wall... because it\'s there
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Should RomanArmy.com have an Equipment Section? - by Anonymous - 02-08-2001, 09:57 PM
copyrights for images? - by richard - 02-12-2001, 12:43 PM
Re: Should RomanArmy.com have an Equipment Section? - by Anonymous - 02-13-2001, 02:00 AM
Re: Should RomanArmy.com have an Equipment Section? - by Anonymous - 02-13-2001, 08:21 PM
Re: Should RomanArmy.com have an Equipment Section - by mcbishop - 02-20-2001, 07:07 PM
Re: Should RomanArmy.com have an Equipment Section? - by Anonymous - 07-06-2001, 01:29 PM
Simkins stuff is posted - by Caius Fabius - 07-08-2001, 07:19 AM
Re: equipment section - by richard - 07-08-2001, 03:26 PM
Now we do - by JRSCline - 08-01-2001, 03:19 PM
equipment section philosophy - by Goffredo - 10-09-2001, 08:18 AM
Re: equipment section philosophy - by richard - 12-22-2001, 01:53 PM
Re: equipment section philosophy - by JRSCline - 12-29-2001, 10:41 PM
Re: equipment section - by Anonymous - 01-16-2002, 02:11 AM
Re: equipment section - by Anonymous - 02-02-2002, 01:00 AM
Re: equipment section - by Anonymous - 04-04-2003, 08:42 PM
Re: equipment section - by Jasper Oorthuys - 04-05-2003, 04:56 AM
Re: equipment section - by Anonymous - 04-17-2003, 11:51 PM
equipment section - by Ivlivs·Aemilivs·Celer - 03-31-2004, 04:47 PM
Re: equipment section - by JRSCline - 05-04-2004, 07:38 AM
Re: Should RomanArmy.com have an Equipment Section? - by Anonymous - 12-26-2004, 04:37 AM

Forum Jump: