Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fire of 64 AD - Secrets of the Dead episode
#6
I think the argument that Nero was not responsible for the fire is certainly credible. Fire was a perennial problem in the Subura, and his building plans were well known.

However to suggest that the Christians were not scapegoated for the fire is a little harder considering that Nero made scapegoats of so many people during his reign, jews, egyptians, greeks, etc etc.

Susanna,

I agree with you about the timeliness of this. It seems coordinated with the whole Da Vinci code nonsense.

BTW -

Do you have bigger pictures of your lyre! It looks fabulous! Do you have any recordings?

Travis
Theodoros of Smyrna (Byzantine name)
aka Travis Lee Clark (21st C. American name)

Moderator, RAT

Rules for RAT:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules">http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic.php?Rules for posting

Oh! and the Toledo helmet .... oh hell, forget it. :? <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_confused.gif" alt=":?" title="Confused" />:?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Fire of 64 AD - Secrets of the Dead episode - by tlclark - 05-09-2006, 12:20 PM
Proof? Rome Fire? - by Caius Fabius - 05-10-2006, 01:36 AM
even better - by Caius Fabius - 05-14-2006, 06:15 PM
Re: even better - by tlclark - 05-19-2006, 05:23 PM

Forum Jump: