For my first post I would like to discuss Peter Heather's "The Fall of the Roman Empire". I found the book quite illuminating. It inspired me to author a science fiction novel about the collapse of an interstellar empire (which I've just recently submitted). Before I get into that I would like to hear other people's opinions about Heather's book and their views on the fall of the Western Roman Empire. If any of you are science fiction fans then you know that Asimov in his classic "Foundation" series favored Gibbons explanation for the collapse of the Western Roman Empire: decadence and the impact of Chritianity on Rome's warror spirit. I favor Heather's: overextension and Rome's influence on the Gemanic world, in affect Romanizing them, followed by the Hunnic pressure that forced the Germanic tribes westward. Any thoughts?
Posts: 723
Threads: 77
Joined: Mar 2001
Reputation:
0
The gothic war was devastating and weakened Italy so much that when the Longobards came there was almost no resistance.
Heather's book is a great read and have recommended successfully it to several friends.
Another book that I am reading is "The fall of Rome and the end of civilization" by Bryan Ward-Perkins (2005). Unlike Heathers' book that I read in four consecutive days (long week-end plus one), I started well enough the book of Ward-Perkins but then I lost steam, not because the book isn't interesting (else I wounldn't be reccommending it). I will certainly finish it before the summer vacation during which my list of books to read is for the moment at Beevor's book on D-Day, Yann Le Bohec's book "L'arme'e romaine sous le Bas-Empire" (italian translation), and "Aristote au Mont-Saint-Michel" (italian traslation) by Sylvain Gougenheim.
Has anyone read Yann Le Bohec's book?
Jeffery Wyss
"Si vos es non secui of solutio tunc vos es secui of preciptate."
Posts: 227
Threads: 30
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
I have already read Yann Le Bohec's book and made a review in this forum. I wasn't much impressed because it's other book about the early empire is much better.
Posts: 648
Threads: 34
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
Good points Robert, I was more referring to Theodoric than the other rulers. Justinian also certainly did not win a swift victory in Italy, which devastated the cities there, for a place that really was not "barbarian" as people imagine. The end results certainly were not favorable either. Clearly not being able to hold the peace so that Italy could rebuild was a failure. Perhaps a swifter win in Italy initially could have left some money and resources to properly defend what had been won.
Markus Aurelius Montanvs
What we do in life Echoes in Eternity
Roman Artifacts
Posts: 2,366
Threads: 187
Joined: Jun 2004
Reputation:
0
Great point, Robert.
Too often people tend to see the reconquest of Italy in a vacuum, forgetting the effects of the great plague.
Besides, Italy and Africa were expected to be self-sufficient in paying for their own defence. The latter certainly was and even proved to be an excellent base for Heraclius to launch his bid for power. In Italy, too, many exarchs felt strong enough to break away from Constantinople or even declare themselves emperor.
~Theo
Jaime