Posts: 350
Threads: 22
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
39
This was written in Osprey “Roman Republic Warships 509 BC to 27 BC,” New Vanguard 225. On page 19, under the heading “The oneraria,” the author states “According to Sallust (Rom. Hist., 3,8) a large phaselus carried a cohort of 600 men.”
I’ve looked but have not been able to find this reference. Has anyone come across this reference before?
Steven
Posts: 712
Threads: 13
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
46
Lionel Casson on page 167 in his book "Ships and Seamanship in the Ancient World mentions the phaselus. Sorry I had to do text as a jpg to save the Ancient Greek (I think) as converting it to text did some strange things.
This was the reference on the bottom of the page. 55 Sallust (Hist. 3.8, Maurenbrecher) mentions a cohors una grandi phaselo vecta "a cohort carried in a large phaselus". (a cohort at full strength was 600 men). Casson's translation
Regards
Michael Kerr
Michael Kerr
"You can conquer an empire from the back of a horse but you can't rule it from one"
Posts: 1,973
Threads: 40
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
101
I can't find the Latin in Nathan's link, so for completeness I add it here:
Et forte in navigando cohors una, grandi phaselo vecta, a ceteris deerravit, marique placido a duobus praedonum myoparonibus circumventa.
As Nathan says, there is no mention of 600 men there.
Michael King Macdona
And do as adversaries do in law, -
Strive mightily, but eat and drink as friends.
(The Taming of the Shrew: Act 1, Scene 2)
Posts: 350
Threads: 22
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
39
Thank you Michael, Nathan and Renatus. As this reputation system still does not work, I have given you a “neutral” rating.
Nathan wrote:
It's a modern gloss.
I had thought as much. After years of studying the primary sources and academic research, one becomes familiar with the data relating to cohort sizes. As this reference was not common, nor widely found, I knew something was amiss.
Nathan wrote:
No actual evidence here for 600-man cohorts, just the steady accumulation of assumptions.
A friend had recently commented that “It is always difficult to separate the interpretation of the Academic from the primary source.”