Posts: 601
Threads: 80
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
I´d think that it was like a Swiss knife: multi-use.
But I´ve got no idea :oops:
-This new learning amazes me, Sir Bedevere. Explain again how
sheep´s bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
Iagoba Ferreira Benito, member of
Cohors Prima Gallica
and current Medieval Martial Arts teacher of
Comilitium Sacrae Ensis, fencing club.
Posts: 39
Threads: 23
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
Well, it could be a lamp kit type thing.
But I remember reading Romans were highly fond of plucking hair from the eyebrows, armpits, and down there for it was "barbaric" or something or other.
I dunno.
Nicholas De Oppresso Liber
[i]“It is not death that a man should fear, but he should fear never beginning to live.â€
Posts: 8,090
Threads: 505
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
I think you've got a point Caballo. Food for thought at the very least.
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!
Posts: 441
Threads: 14
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
Imagine if someone's wife or husband got the lamp kit mixed up with the manicure kit.
Sara T.
Moderator
RAT Rules for Posting
Courage is found in unlikely places. [size=75:2xx5no0x]
~J.R.R Tolkien[/size]
Posts: 2,914
Threads: 21
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
1
This is a Brooch known as a Chatelaine type,they are a native British device for keeping toilet articles together. They can be placed around the 2nd century AD,
Brian Stobbs
Posts: 8,090
Threads: 505
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
That's exactly what Caballo's questioning; is it for toilet tools? It might be the accepted description, but on what basis?
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!
Posts: 2,784
Threads: 313
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
1
What would prove it for me would be if there were remains of ear wax or similar (!) on the set.
As far as I can see, the evidence seems to be that these manicure sets have been found with later female burials , and therefore are associated with manicure. Could just as easily been a symbol of good house-keeping- keep the home fires burning and all that.
Similar sets were found on Saxon sites such as West Stow. Were the Saxons as keen on manicure and hair plucking? Or were the "manicure sets" simply an essential tool for every house that had an oil lamp for light?
Posts: 2,914
Threads: 21
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
1
The book by Richard Hattatt "Brooches of Antiquity" is where this type of artifact is mentioned, some have a differing pattern to the one shown here which is a Geometric design. The other style is known as an Umbonate pattern, similar to the Umbonate brooch however a little more expanded with the crossbar to carry the bath or toilet articles.
Brian Stobbs
Posts: 2,914
Threads: 21
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
1
This Manicure set as Adrian mentions is not a brooch but was suspended on a belt, I would like to know if the Museum has also the belt it was carried on. Is it a situation where we have to believe Arcaeologists when they see a ring that it was carried on a belt, could this ring have had a thong that went around the neck so the soldier did not lose his toilet items on the way to the bath house. The subject of going to the bath is an interesting question, did the soldier strip down to his under garments then fix a Chatelaine brooch to his Sagum or did he carry his toilet items around his neck on a leather thong. Indeed he did not have a bath towel, so one has to imagine did the cloak have yet another use. These useful tools could very easy be lost, so if it were a Chatelaine or the thing we see here they both play an important part in not loosing what was essential for weekly clean up at the bath house.
Brian Stobbs