04-17-2008, 06:09 PM
Right.
Just one detail, other articles mention this fort was unusual in that it was positioned with only one gate going through the wall, meaning the other 3 would be behind the wall.
I will take this into account when talking to Steve for the reconstruction.
As discussed in other threads, the stanegate may also make an appearence, although this is also conjectural (but most likely) and will be noted as such.
Regards,
Yuri
Just one detail, other articles mention this fort was unusual in that it was positioned with only one gate going through the wall, meaning the other 3 would be behind the wall.
I will take this into account when talking to Steve for the reconstruction.
As discussed in other threads, the stanegate may also make an appearence, although this is also conjectural (but most likely) and will be noted as such.
Regards,
Yuri
