05-04-2008, 11:54 PM
Hi,
At the momment im looking at something like this (please ignore the geometrical discrepancies and stuff). For a small fort (1.53 acres) holding a quingenary unit (480 infantry) would there be anything missing?
The placement of the granries, commandants house and praetorium is supported by archaeological evidence. The rest is conjectural.
![[Image: plan1hb0.th.jpg]](http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/9352/plan1hb0.th.jpg)
EDIT: The new rather geometrically correct version looks quadratic rather than the more 'playing card spahed' usual roman fort. Is this a problem?
![[Image: plan2bn7.th.jpg]](http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/2163/plan2bn7.th.jpg)
At the momment im looking at something like this (please ignore the geometrical discrepancies and stuff). For a small fort (1.53 acres) holding a quingenary unit (480 infantry) would there be anything missing?
The placement of the granries, commandants house and praetorium is supported by archaeological evidence. The rest is conjectural.
![[Image: plan1hb0.th.jpg]](http://img132.imageshack.us/my.php?image=plan1hb0.jpg:1ocmisgl)
EDIT: The new rather geometrically correct version looks quadratic rather than the more 'playing card spahed' usual roman fort. Is this a problem?
![[Image: plan2bn7.th.jpg]](http://img401.imageshack.us/my.php?image=plan2bn7.jpg:1ocmisgl)
