01-22-2012, 11:18 PM
There has been put forward an opinion that the painting of the last supper is incorrect in its layout, for it should have been set out as a Triclinium for the guest of Honour has to be seated second in on the left side,
His right hand man so to speak is then at the end seat on the left, where in fact this would have been Judas and when Christ leaned over to him and said you must go and do what you have to do he had no obstruction in leaving.
This is where Judas went off as arranged between he and Christ to go to Caiaphas, for to be arrested was the only way Christ would ever get to have an interview with the Chief of the Religion.
Then later when he went into the garden he was bleeding from the forehead, which is indeed a medical failing of many people when under stress where tiny capiliaries can burst in ones forehead.
The money that was given to Judas was in fact a common situation of practice for anyone who would betray a criminal.
From then on everything back fired for Christ and the trial went ahead where the leaders of the Jewish religion were the ones who wanted rid of what had been a Thorn in their side, the normal penalty for the crimes he was said to be guilty of was crucifixion.
This is where we must ask the question as to why particularly with the Roman Courts there was never any written records of this eventfull matter.
His right hand man so to speak is then at the end seat on the left, where in fact this would have been Judas and when Christ leaned over to him and said you must go and do what you have to do he had no obstruction in leaving.
This is where Judas went off as arranged between he and Christ to go to Caiaphas, for to be arrested was the only way Christ would ever get to have an interview with the Chief of the Religion.
Then later when he went into the garden he was bleeding from the forehead, which is indeed a medical failing of many people when under stress where tiny capiliaries can burst in ones forehead.
The money that was given to Judas was in fact a common situation of practice for anyone who would betray a criminal.
From then on everything back fired for Christ and the trial went ahead where the leaders of the Jewish religion were the ones who wanted rid of what had been a Thorn in their side, the normal penalty for the crimes he was said to be guilty of was crucifixion.
This is where we must ask the question as to why particularly with the Roman Courts there was never any written records of this eventfull matter.
Brian Stobbs
