08-29-2013, 06:08 PM
I have been following Boudica for years (no pun!) and am familiar with all of the hypotheses. I wonder, rather than around half a dozen eminent people defending their own theories, has anyone attempted an analysis of known finds? Either around the main favoured sites, or a relevant concentration of in-period finds elsewhere? Perhaps including graves? I always hoped the late Mick Aston might have championed a wider approach. But sadly this is no longer possible.
Davidus