Posts: 1,513
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation:
1
Why didn't Herodotus mention Rome? Other Greek writers of the fifth century such as Hellanicus of Lesbos and Damastes of Sigeum mentioned Rome in connection to the Aeneas myth. Herodotus writes about the Etruscans, Carthaginians and other non-Greek and non-Persian peoples.
Posts: 4,483
Threads: 634
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
Lack of interest? He was writing about the wars of barbarians against Greeks. Sicily was part of those conflicts, but Rome had no military contact with the Greek world.
Jona Lendering
Relevance is the enemy of history
My website
Posts: 1,513
Threads: 210
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation:
1
I suppose so. Rome should have been making itself known on the Mediterranean stage by this time. The first treaty with Carthage is dated to 507 BC, it was a fairly strong local power, it had appeared in Greek mythology through Aeneas, and there is good evidence of Greek, Etruscan and Phoenican ties. It just seems a bit strange to me that Herodotus doesn't even give Rome a mention.
Posts: 4,483
Threads: 634
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
There's a lot he must have known and didn't mention. The sphinx near the pyramids is a case in point. This man really knew which information was necessary in his account; he was, although at first sight it's a mixed bag of varied stuff, ver economical.
Jona Lendering
Relevance is the enemy of history
My website
Posts: 215
Threads: 5
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation:
0
Very interesting, I was aware that Hellanicus wrote on Rome but not a one called Damastes. What was his quote?
Multi viri et feminae philosophiam antiquam conservant.
James S.