06-22-2010, 03:23 PM
...that is because, simply put, the shield is being used in what may be termed "post sarissa" mode. This particular soldier is fighting with sword etc. The photos you attached quite clearly shows that 'Macedonian' shields had porpaxes....
Paralus wrote:
Paralus wrote:
Quote:Except for the similar shield in Pergamon and the exceedingly similar shields carried by infantry on the Paullus monument (and armour in as much as can be made out).The Pergamum shield matches the description in the manuals, as Connolly has demonstrated, and there is a clear distinction between 'foot' armour and the 'high waisted' cavalry cuirass. Compare distinctions between the flared cavalry 'muscled cuirass' and the 'foot version'. These are necessitated by the fact that the cavalryman has his hips splayed when mounted.....
"dulce et decorum est pro patria mori " - Horace
(It is a sweet and proper thing to die for ones country)
"No son-of-a-bitch ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country" - George C Scott as General George S. Patton
Paul McDonnell-Staff
(It is a sweet and proper thing to die for ones country)
"No son-of-a-bitch ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country" - George C Scott as General George S. Patton
Paul McDonnell-Staff