Posts: 819
Threads: 64
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
9
I am trying to get a better feel for Plutarch's Life of Gaius Gracchus, 5.1, which states that the Roman govt took over responsibility for paying for and providing the soldiers' clothing. I am wondering what the actual Greek word was and if it only related to clothing, or to military arms or equipment in general.
Thanks!
Posts: 450
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
0
For much of the Roman period, the soldier bought their own equipment and paid for it themselves. It cost them various amounts through the ages but as the time got later, the gear got more expensive. The state did sometimes give equipment to the soldiers, but it depended on the circumstances.
Regards, Jason
Posts: 450
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation:
0
In the Late Republic, the soldiers were levied rapidly for wars like the Cimbrian and Civil wars where legion numbers made it to over XXXX. The poorer citizens were often recruited for service or were drafted, and they could not afford armor, so they were most likely given it to them by their commander out of his own pay check.
Regards, Jason
Posts: 1,973
Threads: 40
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
101
Quote:I am wondering what the actual Greek word was and if it only related to clothing, or to military arms or equipment in general.
To answer your question, the word in the Greek is
esthêta, the accusative singular of
esthês, 'a garment, clothes, raiment'. This is the equivalent of the Latin
vestis, 'a garment, clothes, attire'. It seems clear that it is indeed clothing that is referred to, rather than anything else.
Michael King Macdona
And do as adversaries do in law, -
Strive mightily, but eat and drink as friends.
(The Taming of the Shrew: Act 1, Scene 2)