Posts: 791
Threads: 23
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
5
According to Scolasticus Valen's commanded the Thracian field army. I'll have to trawl through all the notes I made for my book and get back to you about the sources ok.
Adrian Coombs-Hoar
Posts: 791
Threads: 23
Joined: May 2010
Reputation:
5
Actually, talking of my book, it might be worth you picking up a copy to see the sources I used for my references Nik, that way be both benefit ;-)
Adrian Coombs-Hoar
Posts: 10
Threads: 6
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
0
I must admit, I am quite confused.
Did the armies have actual names (Other than "in the presence")? Or do we just name the by location?
In addition, were the en prasentalis a concrete formation? Or was the title given to any army that was under the emperor's personal command?
Chris
Posts: 4,861
Threads: 129
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation:
33
They do have actual names. The Praesentalis I and II armies, both being stationed next to Constantinople in the Chersonesus and at Chrysiopolis. The Thracian Army, headquartered at Adrianople, and the Illyrian army headquartered at I believe Serdica? The Oriental Army was headquartered out of Antioch. The Gallic Army out of first Trier and later Arles, and the Italic/Praesental army out of I think Aquileia.
Posts: 62
Threads: 4
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
2
Aren't those the titles of the army commanders rather than the names of the armies themselves? We tend to use them as the army names but did the Romans?
Posts: 4,861
Threads: 129
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation:
33
I'd imagine to a certain extent, yes. Those titles changed as well (Comes Hispenias becomes Magister Militum per Hispenias in 441, Magister Peditum and Equitum become the Comes et Magister Utriusque Militiae Senior and Iunior by 429 AD).
Posts: 4,861
Threads: 129
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation:
33
Ian Hughes reconstructed it pretty effectively. It was impossible for both Aetius and Felix to hold the Magister Utriusque Militiae command in 429, yet Felix was still alive when Aetius is first mentioned in this position. The only logical explanation is that there was a Junior and Senior command derived from the Equitum and Peditum commands. There are other arguments in support of this dating from Constantius III's holding of the Magister Utriusque Militiae title.
Posts: 62
Threads: 4
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
2
However, Ian doesn't, as I recall, use the terms Senior and Iunior or suggest that the Romans did. He suggests, again as I recall, that additional titles to comes et magister utriusque militum distinguish seniority between those with the MVM title.
Posts: 4,861
Threads: 129
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation:
33
I'd have to go back and read his book again. I've forgotten so much of this when I used to be able to cite the primary sources off the top of my head.
Posts: 283
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation:
3
(04-11-2016, 07:11 AM)nikgaukroger Wrote: Aren't those the titles of the army commanders rather than the names of the armies themselves? We tend to use them as the army names but did the Romans?
I guess a roman would call the Army of the Comes Thraciae the Exercitus Thraciae or Exercitus Comitis Thraciae.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas