Posts: 1,337
Threads: 175
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
Considering converting a riveted maile shirt I have to use for 1st cent Legionare impression. I am curious how long should the sleeves be, and how long should I make it in the body?
My plan is to purchase another shirt and use it to construct the cape part of the hamata.
"...quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est."
a.k.a. Paul M.
Posts: 120
Threads: 5
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
From what I've been told and read myself the shirt should probably be sleeveless and reach the mid-thigh area. From my experience weaving chain the rings you would have used on the sleeves will put well on your way with the shoulder doubling!
Brent Grolla
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Posts: 2
Threads: 1
Joined: May 2005
Reputation:
0
If you make your hamata in a rectangular pattern with "seams'under the arms , the mail will fall over your shoulders slightly , and thus create a short sleeve. if you don't want this you should tailor the mail around the arms in the shape of a 'tanktop/basketball'shirt.
As for length I can only refer to stone carvings , on wich a lot of the mail comes to the middle of the upper leg , or to the hips , in wich case pteruges are used.
Posts: 1,337
Threads: 175
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
Actually I am trying to keep my short sleeves on the shirt I am currently working with. Would this make it farby?
"...quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est."
a.k.a. Paul M.
Posts: 115
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
I think farby might be a bit strong (and I don't really like the word anyway).
At some time in the 1stC the mail seem to change from the almost sleeveless doubled mail shirt to and undoubled short sleeved number. The big question is of course when did this happen? The answer is we plain don't know, it has become a bit of a convention amongst reenactors to portray auxiliary in undoubled short sleeved mail and legionaries in doubled sleeveless mail. But I don't know of any evidence to back this up and am of the opinion that it is a distinction that has just evolved on its own with no reference to history. To conclude as far as I can see short sleeved undoubled mail or minimalist sleeved doubled mail is fine and dandy for a 1stC. impression.
Tasciavanous
AKA James McKeand