09-13-2006, 07:32 PM
Nice stabber you got there man!
Well I have read the discussion and I´m still thinking of rehilted sword. Peter Johnsson has told me that lot´s of medieval and viking ageswords he has studied are rehilted many times. There is also lot´s of finds of seaxes and knifes and swords that he has studied that don´t get into referencebook because they are made by smiths of lesser skill. These blades are hiding in museumstorage and are plentiful at least here in Scandinavia.
I have myself been to the Armourys of both the Royal A. of Sweden and the Skokloster Armoury. In these collections you find thousends of blades of all ages´, from bronzeblades dating back 3500 years to 19th c. blades. Many strange variant are in the stores of these armouries. For example a pre-shogunate katana rehilted with a complex rapierstyled hilt at Skokloster.
I belive the sword to be a european sword. It looks like the blade is of at least roman inspiration. The blades in my opinion (based on the writings of E. Okeshott and Peter Johnsson) is the importent part to classify, because the furniture is often replased if damaged but you seldom do the other way around. Keep the furniture and reblade it. The blade is the swords essence. The furniture is cosmetics.
I also base this as a practsioner of Acient and Medeival Martial Arts. 75-90% of the handeling caracteristics of a sword is in the blade. This is what you try to feel when you grab the sword and think of how could or would I use this weapon.
I think this is something that has been less considered by many museum curators the past couple of hundred years. Too much staring att the "Blingbling" and not enough martial skill when making judgement on artefacts found in the ground.
Just my 2 cent....
Well I have read the discussion and I´m still thinking of rehilted sword. Peter Johnsson has told me that lot´s of medieval and viking ageswords he has studied are rehilted many times. There is also lot´s of finds of seaxes and knifes and swords that he has studied that don´t get into referencebook because they are made by smiths of lesser skill. These blades are hiding in museumstorage and are plentiful at least here in Scandinavia.
I have myself been to the Armourys of both the Royal A. of Sweden and the Skokloster Armoury. In these collections you find thousends of blades of all ages´, from bronzeblades dating back 3500 years to 19th c. blades. Many strange variant are in the stores of these armouries. For example a pre-shogunate katana rehilted with a complex rapierstyled hilt at Skokloster.
I belive the sword to be a european sword. It looks like the blade is of at least roman inspiration. The blades in my opinion (based on the writings of E. Okeshott and Peter Johnsson) is the importent part to classify, because the furniture is often replased if damaged but you seldom do the other way around. Keep the furniture and reblade it. The blade is the swords essence. The furniture is cosmetics.
I also base this as a practsioner of Acient and Medeival Martial Arts. 75-90% of the handeling caracteristics of a sword is in the blade. This is what you try to feel when you grab the sword and think of how could or would I use this weapon.
I think this is something that has been less considered by many museum curators the past couple of hundred years. Too much staring att the "Blingbling" and not enough martial skill when making judgement on artefacts found in the ground.
Just my 2 cent....