Login

**richsc** · 12-29-2001, 03:02 AM

I was wondering, given the discussions, if archaeology should be specifically mentioned in the RAT sections? Add it to the 'Reenactment Reconstruction" and make it 
 
"Reenactment, Reconstruction and Archaeology" 
 
Thoughts? Aulus, Legio XX.
the High Noise, Low Signal person for RAT.
ICQ 940236

12-29-2001, 06:09 AM

Since all which we do/make stems from Archaeology I think its a great Idea. 
 
Tiberius

**richsc** · 12-29-2001, 12:11 PM

I was thinking of Mr. Bishop actually, so it's rather in honor of the diggers among us. If we put it in order, I'd say: 
 
Archaeology, Reconstruction & Reenactment Aulus, Legio XX.
the High Noise, Low Signal person for RAT.
ICQ 940236

Goffredo · 12-29-2001, 01:13 PM

A great idea. Am all for it.

12-29-2001, 06:14 PM

If you do, please make it grammatically correct. 
 
Archaeology and Re-enactment & Reconstruction 
 
or 
 
Archaeology, Re-enactment, and Reconstruction 
_________________________________ 
CASCA TARQVINIVS GEMINVS 
<a href=http://www.legio-ix-hispana.org> LEG IX HSPA COH V CEN VIII CON III 
_________________________________

mcbishop · 12-29-2001, 06:53 PM

Just to be awkward, I would have thought it belonged better with Military History (since history and archaeology are disciplines which enable re-enactment and reconstruction). Although they are often uncomfortable bedfellows, you can't really study the Roman army without both history and archaeology and retain any plausibility... (not that that has stood in the way of some classicists... ;-). 
 
Mike Bishop

**richsc** · 12-29-2001, 07:45 PM

History and Archaeology 
 
(has to have happened before it can be dug up) 
 
Reconstruction and Reenactment 
 
(you have to make it before you can wear it) 
 
or something along those lines. Aulus, Legio XX.
the High Noise, Low Signal person for RAT.
ICQ 940236

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me