Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Documentary worse than Hollywood!
#1
Sorry but I have to ventilate this!

Just saw a Documentary from the History Channel called "Barbarians - the Huns".

I could almost stand the "On the bloodstained lands of Ancient Europe a new tidalwave of violence was brought forward bla bla bla yada yada yada" narrative of the dokumentary! The thing that realy annyed me was the kit the extras had!

The Huns = fur, more fur and then a little fur ontop of the fur to ephazise that they had... fur. Looked like they was hired directly on the set of Conan the Barbarian! The swords was some chunks of metal seemingly found at the local scrapyard and vagule shaped in a swordlike manner. Belts and straps made out of hempstrings. To summerize, not even the most winesoaked-17 year old-firsttime-larper would get away with that kit.

The Romans= Plastic scutums vaugly in the correct shape but clearly made out of plastic and in a shade of sunbleached lollypop red. Nitted hemata. And all if the romans had had plastic in a kind of 50 to 150 AD design.

Nice formations af ten romans before the battlescene but then scattred fighting in a way that makes a soccergame more intensive and crowded. Handbagging and strikes at plastic shields, soundtracked by somebody hitting a fork to a pot.

The dates and campaines and stuff was probally correct but that I missed out of shear anger at the view tis gave the audience. It´s like doing a dokumentary on the Battle of El Alamein with the brittish troops in redcoats and the German soldiers in Landsknecht kit.

Sorry again for the rambling! But isn´t this sad. I hope I did not offend somebody by this.

Martin
Reply
#2
Martin., History chanell did not make only this "pearl".
If you can stomach it you can check their inaccuracies on the "Vikings" especially Harald Hardradi story. :evil:
And if you enjoy onesided biased story check the "Crusades" :twisted:
Did I mentioned that they presented Alexander as pschuchotic maniac?

OK if someone makes a film or a theatrical play artistic licence is forgiven
but I agree with you that a documentary MUST stay a documentary. :!:
Kind regards
Reply
#3
I have on DVD those four documentals:

Barbarians:
1)The Vikings

2) The Goths

3)The Mongols

4) The Huns

:oops: :roll: :oops: :oops: :oops:
  
Remarks by Philip on the Athenian Leaders:
Philip said that the Athenians were like the bust of Hermes: all mouth and dick. 
Reply
#4
Quote:I have on DVD those four documentals:

Barbarians:
1)The Vikings

2) The Goths

3)The Mongols

4) The Huns

:oops: :roll: :oops: :oops: :oops:

Ehhh! Well as I sid, the facts in the program was probally correct, it was the package I objected to... (:oops: :roll: Cry :oops: :wink: )
Reply
#5
At first those "dramatized" history documents seemed refreshing, now the more or less cheezy "reconstructions" are beginning to be annoying!

I remember I had on video-cassette a documentary about Trajan`s Dacian wars. It was quite good, there was even Peter Connolly himself presenting some equipment like the notorious dacian falx.

The more recent documents with those dramatized parts (murder of Cleopatra etc.) seems to be made with very little historical research and as you mentioned the equipment is awful. And of course the latest secret revealed: Alexander the great, Caesar, Richard the Lionheart, Saladin Attila, they were all gays! In fact Bukefalos had some straight relationships before he left Macedonia :wink: .....

O Tempora O Mores!
Virilis / Jyrki Halme
PHILODOX
Moderator
[Image: fectio.png]
Reply
#6
Murder of Cleopatra, oops :oops: ! I meant Tutankhamon, of course!
Are there any good DVD`s available on roman army? Lots of pictures of the re-enactors and their gear?
Virilis / Jyrki Halme
PHILODOX
Moderator
[Image: fectio.png]
Reply
#7
You do realize they use re-enactors
in these productions. Sometimes the
kits are very good, sometimes not.
I still enjoy these programs and am
grateful that someone is keeping the
interest alive.
Also, many feature scholars who are
RAT members and I'm glad to see them
and support them.

Bukefalos??Alexander's horse?
Andy Booker

Gaivs Antonivs Satvrninvs

Andronikos of Athens
Reply
#8
Yes, I know Bukefalos was Alexander`s horse :wink: ! I was trying to describe the over-enthusiasm of some document-makers in making new interpretations of the old data....

The maing thing is to keep the interest alive, you`re right Andy!
Virilis / Jyrki Halme
PHILODOX
Moderator
[Image: fectio.png]
Reply


Forum Jump: