Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Were the Germans physically superior?
True.
The Roman army did not consist of "mostly Germans," but the later (post-400) Roman army did not consist of mosty Romans. The figure I've heard-- coming from the innacuracies the History Channel-- was one Italian for every hundred somebody-elses, whomever they might be. The figure can't be fully accurate, considering its HC source; but it might not be far off. Considering the two large recruitments, circa 382-383, by both Gratian and Theodosius, a high percentage of new blood came from the Goths, Alans, Heruli, Vandals, Gepids... three fifths being Germans. But the case is an isolated decade in a Roman millenium. Smile
Alan J. Campbell

member of Legio III Cyrenaica and the Uncouth Barbarians

Author of:
The Demon's Door Bolt (2011)
Forging the Blade (2012)

"It's good to be king. Even when you're dead!"
             Old Yuezhi/Pazyrk proverb
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: - by MeinPanzer - 03-27-2010, 10:37 PM
Re: Re: - by Tarbicus - 03-30-2010, 10:03 AM
Re: - by Alanus - 04-01-2010, 04:52 AM
Re: - by SigniferOne - 05-06-2010, 05:51 AM
Re: Were the Germans physically superior? - by Alanus - 05-30-2010, 04:41 AM
Re: Were the Germans physically superior? - by Abe - 12-25-2012, 04:59 AM

Forum Jump: