08-18-2006, 05:25 PM
"ambrosius wrote:
Quote:
It would also be nice if people would actually read the authors or researches that they attack or semi-quote. Has anyone actually read the original "Apartheid" article?
Yep. Didn't believe a word of it.
And which part of the above sentence did you not understand?
It's nonsense for that article to propose that one gene-pool can
sellectively outbreed and replace another gene-pool through 'apartheid'.
It would be impossible. Look at South Africa. "
Mike, I too have some doubts about the "apartheid" article; but I must agree with Andreas that you haven't offered a particularly useful critique of said article. I am not knowledgeable in modeling population genetics - if you can point out exactly why the article is "nonsense", that would be more illuminating.
Quote:
It would also be nice if people would actually read the authors or researches that they attack or semi-quote. Has anyone actually read the original "Apartheid" article?
Yep. Didn't believe a word of it.
Quote:Now there's comprehensive and constructive criticism
for you
And which part of the above sentence did you not understand?
It's nonsense for that article to propose that one gene-pool can
sellectively outbreed and replace another gene-pool through 'apartheid'.
It would be impossible. Look at South Africa. "
Mike, I too have some doubts about the "apartheid" article; but I must agree with Andreas that you haven't offered a particularly useful critique of said article. I am not knowledgeable in modeling population genetics - if you can point out exactly why the article is "nonsense", that would be more illuminating.
Felix Wang
