Posts: 3,607
Threads: 226
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
5
I was wondering whether the Haltern shield bosses (like these wonderful reproductions by manninimperial)
belonged to shields without a spina, or if they had a wooden spina starting at the end of the shield boss? Anyone any ideas?
Also Junkelmann states in "Die Legionen des Augustus" that the later scuta had brass spinae, so I was wondering whether these actually are present in the archaeological record. These would go well with such a boss
, but wood would be quite a sensible choice as well.
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
Posts: 4,887
Threads: 163
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation:
0
Hi Christian,
The first photo (at the top in your post) has no provision for a spina, but the boss below it has the two raised openings to take a strengthening bar or spina. There are similar examples from Mainz and Carlisle (slightly later period) of this type.
Here's the find from Mainz..
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b242/ ... bo_1-2.jpg
There are also finds of bifurcated metal shield strengtheners which have been found in the same context as the second type of boss. (Namely Carlisle)
Posts: 8,090
Threads: 505
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Not really answering the question, but these links and pics often get lost in the morass of posts: The Fayum Scutum
[url:tcm1mpkt]http://www.roma-victrix.com/armamentarium/scvta_scutumelfayum.htm[/url]
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!
Posts: 8,090
Threads: 505
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
But here's the Carlisle one at top:
[url:1vphwevm]http://www.roma-victrix.com/armamentarium/scvta_umboequitatus.htm[/url]
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!
Posts: 4,887
Threads: 163
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation:
0
Thanks Jim, I didn't post that image as it is of a different typ[e of boss!
The Fayum scutum has a wooden boss, simplified later by the iron equivalent.
Posts: 3,607
Threads: 226
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
5
Quote:bifurcated metal shield strengtheners
Hmm. That´s interesting. Do you have any pics of these?
I am working on a 9 AD shield, the shield body is finished, but I am not sure about the assemblage of the findings. AFAIK there are no metal spinae from Haltern or Kalkriese. I suppose that the first shield boss above could go with a Kasr-El-Harit shield body without spinae, and the second with either a wooden or a metal spina, what do you think?
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
Posts: 13,279
Threads: 102
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
Would the wooden boss on the Fayum scutum have had a metal boss over it? I was waiting for one like that, but the carpenter quit, so now it will only have a metal boss!
If it is too unauthentic, then I will probably try to make the wooden boss and spina myself! (and off into la la land I go)
I am thinking they were still using the republican scutum in 9AD?
Is that the kind you are refering to here?
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Posts: 3,607
Threads: 226
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
5
Kasr-El-Harit is in the Fayum, so it´s the same shield. Fayum is simply too unprecise, as there are other shields from there as well..
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
Posts: 4,887
Threads: 163
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation:
0
Quote:I am thinking they were still using the republican scutum in 9AD?
Possibly, but by the Augustan period you were more likely to see the curve-sided scutum (top and bottom cut off).
@ Christian. I know I have some photos somewhere of the metal strengtheners, As soon as I find them I'll post them.
Posts: 3,607
Threads: 226
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
5
Cool!
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
Posts: 13,279
Threads: 102
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
Great, I already have one of them! That was one reason I wanted it!
The republican will do for a Caesarian impression then! D
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Posts: 4,887
Threads: 163
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation:
0
Ok, Found some pics Christian!
These shield components are from Vindonissa. The parts with the loops at the ends are the bifurcated strengtheners I mentioned earlier..
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b242/ ... ldbars.jpg
There are some in the Lunt Museum in Coventry that I have seen up close too.
Michael Simkins' reconstruction places them on the front face of the shield
Which would fit in nicely with the shield boss from Carlisle.
The Simkins reconstruction of the Kasr el Harit scutum used the boss from Mainz and wooden spina, although he also added a metal facing to the spina.
[url:3jmvnyqb]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b242/peronis/KasrelHarit.jpg[/url]
Dear Caiustarquitius,
in my opinion there is a mixture of shield types in the augustan period.
The arch in Orange (around 20 AD) shows still the republican oval-scutum and the relief from St. Remy (Glanum), dated as late augustan, shows clearly the cut-scutum.
Posts: 3,607
Threads: 226
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
5
Peroni, thanks a lot! o
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
Posts: 8,090
Threads: 505
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
I don't understand why a metal facing would be added to an already thickened shield area with a wooden spine and/or or umbo? Unless the easily replaced metal parts were applied to save on the much harder to replace wooden parts, which were integral to the scutum's construction in the first place.
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!
|