RomanArmyTalk
Acceptable Scutum Sizes? - Printable Version

+- RomanArmyTalk (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat)
+-- Forum: Reenactment (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Roman Re-Enactment & Reconstruction (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/forumdisplay.php?fid=26)
+--- Thread: Acceptable Scutum Sizes? (/showthread.php?tid=21672)



Acceptable Scutum Sizes? - Pointer - 10-30-2012

What are acceptable Rectangular Legionnaire Scutum sizes for 40 ad-70 ad? (In inches)
Which is preferred in Linen and or Leather?


Acceptable Scutum Sizes? - M. Val. Naso - 10-30-2012

AFAIK there are no complete shield which have survived from that period, and sizes probably varied. There is one from a description of Polybius (2nd c. BC), which correlates with the Fayum Scutum (1st BC), 128 tall (ab. 52"), and 63.5 wide (25"). The ones from Trajan's Column range from 37-42" in height, 24-33" in width.

And I suggest, you should make it from wood, not linen or leather Tongue


Acceptable Scutum Sizes? - Quintius Clavus - 10-30-2012

The linen vs. leather is the facing on the scutum. Leather, I would surmise, was by far more common - and that is the face material on the Dura Europas scutum. The Fayum scutum had more than one layer on its face, one of which was, I believe, felt (lamb's wool felt?). It had covering material on its back, too, if I recall correctly.
One should also not assume that all were necessarily of rectangular shape or of the cut-off top/bottom oval types either. Both were probably used in the 1st Century AD. This period is before the central fabrica-factory system of the late Roman period. Legions could very well have been making scuta in the fortresses and/or contracting out to local suppliers.
In the eastern empire the cities had contractors/workshops who simply went over to supplying the Romans after they conquered the area rather than the Hellenistic rulers who preceded the Romans.


Acceptable Scutum Sizes? - Pointer - 10-30-2012

Thanks Mark... I'll make a note of that wood part. LOL I meant covered in wood or leather. I know bot are acceptable, just wondering which is preferred among reenactors.


Acceptable Scutum Sizes? - Gaius Julius Caesar - 10-30-2012

I would suggest rawhide as opposed to leather.
The one I've handled covered in leather was quite a bit heavier than you would want to be fighting with all day. And leather is quite soft!


Acceptable Scutum Sizes? - Olaf - 10-30-2012

If I recall correctly, the Dura Scutum had a facing of two layers of linen, covered by one layer of thin "parchment", rawhide I would assume.
There was a very thorough German study on Roman shields published a while ago, I think.


Acceptable Scutum Sizes? - Pointer - 11-01-2012

I have seen them 40" x 30" and 24" x 36" Is the 24" x 36" too small or appropriate?

Also... I was reading somewhere that the Scutums had hinges and or a hook and eye that could connect Scutums side by side. I have not been able to account for that historically though. Is there any proof of that? One other thing I recently read was there was a holder on this inside of the shield that would hold up to six hand throwing darts? Like our common day lawn dart game. (I cannot remember where I saw pictures of this can anyone help?)


Acceptable Scutum Sizes? - Paul Elliott - 11-01-2012

Patrick, there are no clips or hinges to connect shields together. The darts you've seen are plumbatae from the Late Roman Empire, they might have been fastened behind the oval shield of the day, my preferred theory is that they were held in the same hand as the shield ....