09-21-2016, 07:41 AM
(09-20-2016, 11:10 PM)Steven James Wrote: Here's the link to the paperInteresting research.
https://www.academia.edu/5520314/Arrows_...kly_digest
Theoretically, the required strength of the surface layer is inversely proportional to the length over which it has to resist the arrow.
So, whilst metal armour appears a good idea - if it is pierced so there is no "give" (~1mm deflection ) then something 1/10 of the strength will be as effective if it gives over ~10mm.
So, theoretically, the ideal armour would be a strong, light surface layer with a series of soft under layers that allows the surface layer to deaccelerate the arrow "slowly".
Oh the grand oh Duke Suetonius, he had a Roman legion, he galloped rushed down to (a minor settlement called) Londinium then he galloped rushed back again. Londinium Bridge is falling down, falling down ... HOLD IT ... change of plans, we're leaving the bridge for Boudica and galloping rushing north.