Posts: 4,483
Threads: 634
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
I made a photo of this rooftile in the reopened Xanten museum. It reads something like LE? XX??, and I can not make sense of it is. I'd say the first word is LEG, but the last sign is not a G; it looks more like an X, but the writer uses a different X, so it isn't an X. The final signs are a ligature about which I cannot even think a hypothesis. Is there someone who is smarter than I am?
Jona Lendering
Relevance is the enemy of history
My website
Posts: 3,616
Threads: 130
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation:
52
Quote:Is there someone who is smarter than I am?
Probably not!
But, back to the tilestamp ... I'm tempted to read LE(gio) XXX (although all three Xs, as you noted, are not identical), but I cannot force the remainder to read VV (for Ulpia Victrix). The legion always has these cognomina, as far as I can see.
Indeed, more bizarrely, that remainder looks like PRI in mirror image, but if the stamp were reversed, the L at the start would be upside-down. (For Primigenia, we need XXII, in any case.) A frustrating conundrum. :?
[size=85:3srdb5jw]P.S. Hope you had a good day in Xanten. (Jealous. :mrgreen: )[/size]
Posts: 1,002
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation:
1
I've got a LEG II tile pulled from a spoil heap where the G of LEG is also very indistinct (or possibly not a G at all)...not sure if this was common ...old stamp possibly?
As for the characters at the end...I know that some stamps carried not only the usual LEG ** but also characters to represent the honorific (so some stamps for the X Fratensis are LEG X F). Might it be a LEG XX stamp with a couple of characters after? The very end one might possibly be a 'V' for 'Valeria'?
"Medicus" Matt Bunker
[size=150:1m4mc8o1]WURSTWASSER![/size]
Posts: 1,002
Threads: 30
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation:
1
Quote:Jona Lendering:31e7lu0k Wrote:Is there someone who is smarter than I am?
Probably not!
But, back to the tilestamp ... I'm tempted to read LE(gio) XXX (although all three Xs, as you noted, are not identical), but I cannot force the remainder to read VV (for Ulpia Victrix). The legion always has these cognomina, as far as I can see.
Doh! (slaps forhead), Xanten! Of course it'd be the XXX. :oops:
"Medicus" Matt Bunker
[size=150:1m4mc8o1]WURSTWASSER![/size]
Posts: 13,279
Threads: 102
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
Is it possible the guy who made the stamp was suffering a hangover?
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Posts: 4,483
Threads: 634
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
Quote:Is it possible the guy who made the stamp was suffering a hangover?
Sounds plausible to me.
Jona Lendering
Relevance is the enemy of history
My website
Posts: 477
Threads: 54
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
8
Couldn't it also be LEC XX II (Primigenia) P(ia) F(dielis)?
I believe I see "p" and"f" attached to the lower part of each "I".
Regards,
Jens Horstkotte
Munich, Germany
Posts: 13,279
Threads: 102
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
The bit that looks like lower case 'b' on the left? That was confusing me as well....
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Posts: 477
Threads: 54
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
8
Yes, exactly.
If you look at the tile stamps of XXII PPF here:
[url:2alap61m]http://books.google.de/books?id=6NpBoORyGHAC&printsec=frontcover[/url]
there appear to be other cases where the "II" is dropped or merged with all or part of the "P®PF" (e.g. no. 83 and no. 162)
Regards,
Jens Horstkotte
Munich, Germany
Posts: 3,616
Threads: 130
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation:
52
Quote:Couldn't it also be LEC XX II (Primigenia) P(ia) F(dielis)?
I think it more likely to be LEC XX (II) PRI , where (as I noticed earlier) the PRI appears upside down and mirror-image.
At the time, I didn't think this very likely, but your excellent link to CIL shows that, in fact, it is very likely (cf. no. 64, where PRI appears exactly like this, and others where XXII appears as XX owing to peculiar ligatures)!
Kudos to you. Together, we get there in the end!
Quote:Is it possible the guy who made the stamp was suffering a hangover?
It's quite clear from Jens' CIL link that the men responsible for the tile stamps of XXII Primigenia had a constant hangover!! :lol:
Posts: 477
Threads: 54
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
8
Looking at the picture again, your analysis is probably correct. All I contributed was a little luck with googling.
Regards,
Jens Horstkotte
Munich, Germany
Posts: 2,045
Threads: 116
Joined: Apr 2003
Reputation:
0
Sorry, just how does one get a 'C' from an 'X shape? If LEGIO is abbreviated just "L" then surely "LE" is reasonable too- so LE(G)XXX seems reasonable...
See FABRICA ROMANORVM Recreations in the Marketplace for custom helmets, armour, swords and more!
Posts: 3,616
Threads: 130
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation:
52
Quote:LE(G)XXX seems reasonable...
Not sure what you're suggesting, Matt -- Legio XXX Pri(migenia) ?! :?
Jona: I suspect that, unless it's a recent find, your tile stamp will be found on p. 59 or 60 (which are unavailable in the Google version). The peculiar letter after the LE, which I took to be a botched G (see nos. 123 and 124, where the G is crossed through), may turn out to be the II of XXII (see nos. 10 and 51, where the numeral is written IIXX). A visit to the library may be required!
Posts: 4,483
Threads: 634
Joined: Aug 2005
Reputation:
0
Quote:I think it more likely to be LEC XX (II) PRI
Sounds plausible indeed.
Jona Lendering
Relevance is the enemy of history
My website
|