03-05-2015, 01:12 PM
just one more, I promise.
This is Steves fig 6 the top 826 candidate sites in red, the rest of the 2700 in pale purple/girly pink.
I would contend that the orange is the best area to be looking, not too close, not too far away.
In addition I would scratch/hobble sites south of the Thames, and that giant cluster in the Chilterns well away from any obvious communication routes. So the search range is significantly reduced. Note this is based on an Iceni advance from the northern edge of the Great Chesterford/Thames line, for the reasons previously stated.
[attachment=11917]826filter1.jpg[/attachment]
foot note on Church Stowe showing complete bias.
IF Cambridge were to be accessible then an Iceni approach to CS would be due West. Picking up the Nene Valley thereby making perfect sense of the Hunsbury Hill assembly point and the Eastern approach into the valley of Church Stowe previously outlined. I leave it to others to twist the variables to suit their own sites.
This is Steves fig 6 the top 826 candidate sites in red, the rest of the 2700 in pale purple/girly pink.
I would contend that the orange is the best area to be looking, not too close, not too far away.
In addition I would scratch/hobble sites south of the Thames, and that giant cluster in the Chilterns well away from any obvious communication routes. So the search range is significantly reduced. Note this is based on an Iceni advance from the northern edge of the Great Chesterford/Thames line, for the reasons previously stated.
[attachment=11917]826filter1.jpg[/attachment]
foot note on Church Stowe showing complete bias.
IF Cambridge were to be accessible then an Iceni approach to CS would be due West. Picking up the Nene Valley thereby making perfect sense of the Hunsbury Hill assembly point and the Eastern approach into the valley of Church Stowe previously outlined. I leave it to others to twist the variables to suit their own sites.