06-02-2016, 04:06 PM
(06-02-2016, 02:59 PM)John1 Wrote: is discussing sites close to proposed candidate sites in respect of potential battle associated names too far off the thread?
What other sites are you proposing? This isn't a site, it's a name, in a list of other names widely regarded as corrupt. The etymology that claims a link with the battle doesn't work. Therefore there's surely no substance at all to this argument.
Nathan Ross