Late Roman belt

[Statius]

Of course, the only way to prove it would be to create a database of all such images for comparison

Now there's a project for you in the long winter months Matt

Well I think we can all agree that the belt was a status symbol and much valued by its owner.

As to if it was worn on the battlefield......I am swayed by Matt's argument but not yet fully convinced. The evidence presented by way of statue, fresco, mosaic and funereal sculpture can be interpreted in a myriad of ways as we've proved in this discussion both for and against. The archaeology wouldn't prove incontrovertible evidence one way or the other unless you found a fallen warrior in situ on the battlefield in his armour with or without his broad blingy belt!(We wish unfortunately Dura doesn't happen every day).

Personally I've found a broad belt does alleviate and better distribute the weight of the armour but that's just my experience. Perhaps the circumstantial evidence is pointing us in the direction of some did and others didn't e.g. it was a matter of personal choice?

I do look forward to further discussion on the matter and being further convinced of Matt's interesting and challenging hypothesis!