09-12-2018, 01:12 PM
(09-12-2018, 09:57 AM)Robert Vermaat Wrote: the recent EXARC publication (?) in which archaeologist made a point about accuracy among reenactors.
Interesting, thanks - I didn't know about EXARC! Was that something to do with this event?
Was the point that accuracy is increasing? How would this accuracy be measured, I wonder?
It's interesting too to read through this old thread (and this one, from even further back!). I've noticed quite a few replicas of the 'Christies' helmet appearing among reenactors in recent years; have the questions of authenticity been pretty much settled, then, at least in popular opinion?
I also wondered, looking back at all the points above, about the date of this helmet type (if genuine). The original auction texts say 4th-5th century, whereas most people seem to think 3rd-4th. But if the hinges are seen as being similar to the Deir-el-Medina, and the D-e-M could possibly be dated much later (6th century, I think, according to Christian Miks), then the 'Christies' could be from the end of the ridge helmet chronology, rather than the beginning... So much we don't know!
Nathan Ross